On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/clocksource.h |    3 ++
> >  kernel/time/timekeeping.c   |   48 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: linux-compile-i386.git/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-compile-i386.git.orig/kernel/time/timekeeping.c   2008-01-09 
> > 14:27:26.000000000 -0500
> > +++ linux-compile-i386.git/kernel/time/timekeeping.c        2008-01-09 
> > 14:34:40.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -103,6 +103,54 @@ static inline void __get_realtime_clock_
> >     timespec_add_ns(ts, nsecs);
> >  }
> >
> > +cycle_t notrace get_monotonic_cycles(void)
> > +{
> > +   cycle_t cycle_now, cycle_delta, cycle_raw, cycle_last;
> > +
> > +   do {
> > +           /*
> > +            * cycle_raw and cycle_last can change on
> > +            * another CPU and we need the delta calculation
> > +            * of cycle_now and cycle_last happen atomic, as well
> > +            * as the adding to cycle_raw. We don't need to grab
> > +            * any locks, we just keep trying until get all the
> > +            * calculations together in one state.
> > +            *
> > +            * In fact, we __cant__ grab any locks. This
> > +            * function is called from the latency_tracer which can
> > +            * be called anywhere. To grab any locks (including
> > +            * seq_locks) we risk putting ourselves into a deadlock.
> > +            */
>
> I wonder what makes the compiler read the clock->cycle_raw and
> clock->cycle_last variables twice ? I guess some memory barriers could
> be welcome here ?

We need both cycle_raw and cycle_last to be the same from the time we read
the clock source to the time we calculate cycle_delta. If either one
changes then delta is bogus.

Also, it just occurred to me that this is an old patch. I thought I
renamed cycle_raw to cycle_monotonic. But I must have lost that patch :-/

>
> > +           cycle_raw = clock->cycle_raw;
> > +           cycle_last = clock->cycle_last;
> > +
> > +           /* read clocksource: */
> > +           cycle_now = clocksource_read(clock);
> > +
> > +           /* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
> > +           cycle_delta = (cycle_now - cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> > +
> > +   } while (cycle_raw != clock->cycle_raw ||
> > +            cycle_last != clock->cycle_last);
> > +
> > +   return cycle_raw + cycle_delta;
> > +}

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to