On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 05:22 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 01:07:02PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +/* Called after ACPI is enabled */
> > > > +static int __init acpi_pcie_support_init(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + pcie_aspm_init();
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +fs_initcall(acpi_pcie_support_init);
> > >
> > > Is there any reason to put this in here instead of just making
> > > pcie_aspm_init an initcall?
> > yes, this will evaluate some ACPI methods, so must be called after ACPI
> > is initialized, which is a sub_system call
>
> I wasn't saying that you should change it from being an fs_initcall. I
> was saying that you might want to consider deleting this function and
> adding
>
> fs_initcall(pcie_aspm_init);
>
> in the file that defines pcie_aspm_init.
I thought we'd better put all ACPI support bits support in one routine
call, like OSC_EXT_PCI_CONFIG_SUPPORT, we didn't do it so far, so I
added a new routine. But I might be over thinking.
Thanks,
Shaohua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
