On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:53 PM Menglong Dong <menglong8.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > Seems that the inconsistent usages of 'msg_flags' is a lot, for example the > 'recvmsg()' in 'struct proto' and 'recvmsg()' in 'struct proto_ops': > > int (*recvmsg)(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, > size_t len, int noblock, int flags, > int *addr_len); > > This function prototype is used in many places, It's not easy to fix them. > This patch is already reverted, and I think maybe > I can resend it after I fix these 'int' flags. >
I doubt it now...there are hundreds of functions that are defined as 'proto_ops->recvmsg()'. enn...will this kind of patch be acceptable? Is it the time to give up? With Best Regards, Menglong Dong
