On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 08:17:52PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
SNIP
> > >
> > > For example,
> > >
> > > perf stat -e '{cpu_core/cycles/,cpu_core/instructions/}' -e
> > > '{cpu_atom/cycles/,cpu_atom/instructions/}'
> > >
> > > This usage is common and reasonable. So I think we may need to support
> > > pmu style events.
> >
> > sure, but we don't support 'cpu/cycles/' but we support 'cpu/cpu-cycles/'
> > why do you insist on supporting cpu_core/cycles/ ?
> >
> > jirka
> >
>
> I'm OK to only support 'cpu_core/cpu-cycles/' or 'cpu_atom/cpu-cycles/'. But
> what would we do for cache event?
>
> 'perf stat -e LLC-loads' is OK, but 'perf stat -e cpu/LLC-loads/' is not
> supported currently.
ugh, I keep forgetting those ;-)
>
> For hybrid platform, user may only want to enable the LLC-loads on core CPUs
> or on atom CPUs. That's reasonable. While if we don't support the pmu style
> event, how to satisfy this requirement?
>
> If we can support the pmu style event, we can also use the same way for
> cpu_core/cycles/. At least it's not a bad thing, right? :)
right, it's probably best to use the pmu/LLC-.../ for this,
I'll check the patch again
jirka
