On 18/03/21 15:56, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Test the KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST
and KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST ioctls.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eespo...@redhat.com>

Looks good, thanks.

I queued it with a little extra code to verify KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST in the case that does not return E2BIG.

Paolo

---
  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore        |   1 +
  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   1 +
  .../kvm/x86_64/get_msr_index_features.c       | 124 ++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/get_msr_index_features.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore 
b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
index 32b87cc77c8e..d99f3969d371 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
  /s390x/resets
  /s390x/sync_regs_test
  /x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
+/x86_64/get_msr_index_features
  /x86_64/debug_regs
  /x86_64/evmcs_test
  /x86_64/get_cpuid_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile 
b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index a6d61f451f88..c748b9650e28 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ LIBKVM_aarch64 = lib/aarch64/processor.c lib/aarch64/ucall.c
  LIBKVM_s390x = lib/s390x/processor.c lib/s390x/ucall.c 
lib/s390x/diag318_test_handler.c
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 = x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/get_msr_index_features
  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/evmcs_test
  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/get_cpuid_test
  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/hyperv_cpuid
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/get_msr_index_features.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/get_msr_index_features.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ad9972d99dfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/get_msr_index_features.c
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Test that KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST and
+ * KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST work as intended
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2020, Red Hat, Inc.
+ */
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "processor.h"
+#include "../lib/kvm_util_internal.h"
+
+static int kvm_num_index_msrs(int kvm_fd, int nmsrs)
+{
+       struct kvm_msr_list *list;
+       int r;
+
+       list = malloc(sizeof(*list) + nmsrs * sizeof(list->indices[0]));
+       list->nmsrs = nmsrs;
+       r = ioctl(kvm_fd, KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST, list);
+       TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == E2BIG,
+                               "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST 
probe, r: %i",
+                               r);
+
+       r = list->nmsrs;
+       free(list);
+       return r;
+}
+
+static void test_get_msr_index(void)
+{
+       int old_res, res, kvm_fd;
+
+       kvm_fd = open(KVM_DEV_PATH, O_RDONLY);
+       if (kvm_fd < 0)
+               exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+
+       old_res = kvm_num_index_msrs(kvm_fd, 0);
+       TEST_ASSERT(old_res != 0, "Expecting nmsrs to be > 0");
+
+       if (old_res != 1) {
+               res = kvm_num_index_msrs(kvm_fd, 1);
+               TEST_ASSERT(res > 1, "Expecting nmsrs to be > 1");
+               TEST_ASSERT(res == old_res, "Expecting nmsrs to be identical");
+       }
+
+       close(kvm_fd);
+}
+
+static int kvm_num_feature_msrs(int kvm_fd, int nmsrs)
+{
+       struct kvm_msr_list *list;
+       int r;
+
+       list = malloc(sizeof(*list) + nmsrs * sizeof(list->indices[0]));
+       list->nmsrs = nmsrs;
+       r = ioctl(kvm_fd, KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST, list);
+       TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == E2BIG,
+               "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST probe, r: 
%i",
+                               r);
+
+       r = list->nmsrs;
+       free(list);
+       return r;
+}
+
+struct kvm_msr_list *kvm_get_msr_feature_list(int kvm_fd, int nmsrs)
+{
+       struct kvm_msr_list *list;
+       int r;
+
+       list = malloc(sizeof(*list) + nmsrs * sizeof(list->indices[0]));
+       list->nmsrs = nmsrs;
+       r = ioctl(kvm_fd, KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST, list);
+
+       TEST_ASSERT(r == 0,
+               "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST, r: %i",
+               r);
+
+       return list;
+}
+
+static void test_get_msr_feature(void)
+{
+       int res, old_res, i, kvm_fd;
+       struct kvm_msr_list *feature_list;
+
+       kvm_fd = open(KVM_DEV_PATH, O_RDONLY);
+       if (kvm_fd < 0)
+               exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+
+       old_res = kvm_num_feature_msrs(kvm_fd, 0);
+       TEST_ASSERT(old_res != 0, "Expecting nmsrs to be > 0");
+
+       if (old_res != 1) {
+               res = kvm_num_feature_msrs(kvm_fd, 1);
+               TEST_ASSERT(res > 1, "Expecting nmsrs to be > 1");
+               TEST_ASSERT(res == old_res, "Expecting nmsrs to be identical");
+       }
+
+       feature_list = kvm_get_msr_feature_list(kvm_fd, old_res);
+       TEST_ASSERT(old_res == feature_list->nmsrs,
+                               "Unmatching number of msr indexes");
+
+       for (i = 0; i < feature_list->nmsrs; i++)
+               kvm_get_feature_msr(feature_list->indices[i]);
+
+       free(feature_list);
+       close(kvm_fd);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+       if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_GET_MSR_FEATURES))
+               test_get_msr_feature();
+
+       test_get_msr_index();
+}


Reply via email to