Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Hi, Pavel, > > [Adding Ulrich] > >> I use the last bit in the clone_flags for CLONE_LONGARG. When set it >> will denote that the child_tidptr is not a pointer to a tid storage, >> but the pointer to the struct long_clone_struct which currently >> looks like this: > > I'm probably just totally off the deep end, but something did occur to > me: this looks an awful lot like a special version of the sys_indirect() > idea. Unless it has been somehow decided that sys_indirect() is the > wrong idea, might it not be better to look at making that interface > solve the extended clone() problem as well?
We has such an idea, but as far as I know sys_indirect idea is not yet accomplished. So I risked to propose such an extension for sys_clone. If Andrew says that sys_indirect is on its way to -mm tree, then we'll surely wait and use this one for namespaces. > jon > Thanks, Pavel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/