On Fri 19-03-21 10:18:17, Alexander Lochmann wrote: > LockDoc's results show that t_list_lock has been > replaced by j_list_lock for b_next_transaction, > b_tnext, and b_tprev. > We, therefore, updated the documentation > accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Lochmann <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Horst Schirmeier <[email protected]>
Yeah, I think that was a typo since the beginning. Thanks for the fix. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]> Honza > --- > include/linux/journal-head.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/journal-head.h b/include/linux/journal-head.h > index 75bc56109031..d68ae72784eb 100644 > --- a/include/linux/journal-head.h > +++ b/include/linux/journal-head.h > @@ -80,13 +80,13 @@ struct journal_head { > * Pointer to the running compound transaction which is currently > * modifying the buffer's metadata, if there was already a transaction > * committing it when the new transaction touched it. > - * [t_list_lock] [b_state_lock] > + * [j_list_lock] [b_state_lock] > */ > transaction_t *b_next_transaction; > > /* > * Doubly-linked list of buffers on a transaction's data, metadata or > - * forget queue. [t_list_lock] [b_state_lock] > + * forget queue. [j_list_lock] [b_state_lock] > */ > struct journal_head *b_tnext, *b_tprev; > > -- > 2.20.1 > -- Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR
