On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
s/purpuse/purpose/
s/seperately/separately/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhas...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
---
ipc/sem.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index f6c30a85dadf..780d75eff8c6 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static inline void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct
sem_queue *q, int error,
{
get_task_struct(q->sleeper);
- /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpuse/pairing */
+ /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpose/pairing */
smp_store_release(&q->status, error);
wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, q->sleeper);
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct sem_array *sma,
struct sem_queue *q)
/* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value:
* - complex operations always restart.
- * - wait-for-zero are handled seperately.
+ * - wait-for-zero are handled separately.
* - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that
* altered the array. It must be a decrement, because
* simple increments never sleep.
--
2.26.2
