On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
s/particuar/particular/ Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
--- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed, * otherwise the device will error. - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a * context is referenced in the command stream. -- 2.26.2
