On 03/22/2021 12:46 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Tiezhu Yang wrote:diff --git a/arch/mips/Kconfig b/arch/mips/Kconfig index 160b3a8..4b94ec7 100644 --- a/arch/mips/Kconfig +++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ config MIPS select ARCH_BINFMT_ELF_STATE if MIPS_FP_SUPPORT select ARCH_HAS_FORTIFY_SOURCE select ARCH_HAS_KCOV + select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACEHmm, documentation on ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE seems rather scarce, but based on my guess shouldn't this be "if !EVA"? Maciej
I do not quite know what the effect if MIPS EVA (Enhanced Virtual Addressing) is set, I saw that ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE should be restricted
to archs with non-overlapping address ranges. I wonder whether MIPS EVA will generate overlapping address ranges? If yes, it is better to make ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE depend on !EVA on MIPS. Thanks, Tiezhu

