Andrew Clausen wrote:
> 
> Bryan Henderson wrote:
> > Incidentally, I just realized that the common name "partition ID"
> > for this value is quite a misnomer.  As far as I know, it has
> > never identified the partition, but rather described its contents.
> 
> Yes, "partition type ID" is better.
> 

Why not call it filesystem id, thats what its usually describing

Glenn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to