On 3/22/21 4:54 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
>
> clang points out that the %hu format string does not match the type
> of the variables here:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:263:7: warning: format specifies type
> 'unsigned short' but the argument has type 'unsigned int' [-Wformat]
> version_major, version_minor);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/drm/drm_print.h:498:19: note: expanded from macro 'DRM_ERROR'
> __drm_err(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> ~~~ ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Change it to a regular %u, the same way a previous patch did for
> another instance of the same warning.
It would be good to explicitly call out the change.
ex/ do you mean mine ?
0b437e64e0af ("drm/amdgpu: remove h from printk format specifier")
This was for a different reason.
imo, you do not need to include what another patch did.
so you could also just remove this bit from the commit log.
The change itself looks good.
Reviewed-by: Tom Rix <t...@redhat.com>
>
> Fixes: 0b437e64e0af ("drm/amdgpu: remove h from printk format specifier")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> index e2ed4689118a..c6dbc0801604 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ int amdgpu_uvd_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> if ((adev->asic_type == CHIP_POLARIS10 ||
> adev->asic_type == CHIP_POLARIS11) &&
> (adev->uvd.fw_version < FW_1_66_16))
> - DRM_ERROR("POLARIS10/11 UVD firmware version %hu.%hu is
> too old.\n",
> + DRM_ERROR("POLARIS10/11 UVD firmware version %u.%u is
> too old.\n",
> version_major, version_minor);
> } else {
> unsigned int enc_major, enc_minor, dec_minor;
