On Tue 23-03-21 22:56:53, Muchun Song wrote:
> The pages aren't accounted at the root level, so we cannot uncharge the
> page to the memsw counter for the root memcg. Fix this.

The patch is correct but I do wonder whether this matters much in the
end. We shouldn't really rely on a correct page counter for the root
memcg AFAICS in the kernel. We do not display the value
(mem_cgroup_usage) so there shouldn't be any actual problem. Unless I am
missing something make sure to spell that out in the changelog.

> Fixes: 1f47b61fb407 ("mm: memcontrol: fix swap counter leak on swapout from 
> offline cgroup")
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuc...@bytedance.com>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 533b4b31b464..7d765a106684 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -7155,7 +7155,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_swapout(struct page *page, swp_entry_t 
> entry)
>       if (!cgroup_memory_noswap && memcg != swap_memcg) {
>               if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(swap_memcg))
>                       page_counter_charge(&swap_memcg->memsw, nr_entries);
> -             page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_entries);
> +             if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> +                     page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_entries);
>       }
>  
>       /*
> -- 
> 2.11.0

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Reply via email to