On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:20:02PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:59:25PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > If there were more users it'd be better to have this in the core so that > > > > problems we can detect like cache stuff if that's used but if it's just > > > > one broken device it's probably not worth it, this seems like something > > > > you'd have to try to end up with and which is going to cause timeout > > > > problems with a lot of I2C controllers which would tank performance > > > > enough that people would notice. > > > So Yoda, is this to go into the core, or stay where it is? > > Well, nobody's sent me any patches. > Code is still in the driver in v4. > My question is; should these functions really live in the SS? Perhaps we could avoid using that particular abbreviation. Like I say it depends on how common this is - are we seeing other devices with the same problem?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
