On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:02:40AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I'd love if you could forbid it to compile. Problem is that there's stuff like this all over the place. Plus, just because something is undefined by the standard doesn't mean it's not useful -- it's not possible to write either a kernel or libc without breaking some rules. So any useful compile-time restrictions we could make is if the static expression was not computable (perhaps due to being a word addressed machine), or if we could somehow magically divine that the store would in fact go wrong at runtime. r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Russell King
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Andi Kleen
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Russell King
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Manfred
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Andi Kleen
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Manfred
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Russell King
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Richard Henderson
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Richard Henderson
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Richard Henderson
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Thomas Pornin
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Trond Myklebust
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Manfred Spraul
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Trond Myklebust
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Trond Myklebust
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Compatibility issue with 2.2.19pre7 Trond Myklebust