On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:12:42PM +0100, Fabio Aiuto wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 01:04:08PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 10:09:11AM +0100, Fabio Aiuto wrote: > > > fix the following checkpatch warnings: > > > > > > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses > > > 154: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:154: > > > +#define SET_BITS_TO_LE_4BYTE(__pstart, __bitoffset, __bitlen, __val) \ > > > -- > > > ERROR: Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in > > > a do - while loop > > > 161: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:161: > > > +#define SET_BITS_TO_LE_2BYTE(__pstart, __bitoffset, __bitlen, __val) \ > > > -- > > > ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses > > > 168: FILE: drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h:168: > > > +#define SET_BITS_TO_LE_1BYTE(__pstart, __bitoffset, __bitlen, __val) \ > > > > > > parentheses solution preferred for all fixes and made macros more > > > readables > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiut...@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > .../staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h | 30 +++++++++++-------- > > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h > > > b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h > > > index 76304086107a..5054c2e3384c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/basic_types.h > > > @@ -152,24 +152,30 @@ > > > /* Set subfield of little-endian 4-byte value to specified > > > value. */ > > > /* */ > > > #define SET_BITS_TO_LE_4BYTE(__pstart, __bitoffset, __bitlen, __val) \ > > > - *((u32 *)(__pstart)) = \ > > > - ( \ > > > - LE_BITS_CLEARED_TO_4BYTE(__pstart, __bitoffset, __bitlen) | \ > > > - ((((u32)__val) & BIT_LEN_MASK_32(__bitlen)) << (__bitoffset)) \ > > > + (\ > > > + *((u32 *)(__pstart)) = \ > > > + ( \ > > > + LE_BITS_CLEARED_TO_4BYTE(__pstart, __bitoffset, > > > __bitlen) | \ > > > + ((((u32)__val) & BIT_LEN_MASK_32(__bitlen)) << > > > (__bitoffset)) \ > > > + )\ > > > ) > > > > > > > These macros are terrible and this makes it uglier. Better to just > > ignore checkpatch until we can figure out a way to re-write this > > properly. > > > > regards, > > dan carpenter > > > > I see, will drop the patch for now.
Please resend a v2 set of this series so I know what to apply here... thanks, greg k-h
