Re: [PATCH v4 14/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Expand the xstate buffer on the first use of dynamic user state

[Bae, Chang Seok]

On Mar 26, 2021, at 09:34, Jann Horn <ja...@google.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 7:56 PM Chang S. Bae <chang.seok....@intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>> +       if (handle_xfirstuse_event(&current->thread.fpu))
>> +               return;
> 
> What happens if handle_xfirstuse_event() fails because vmalloc()
> failed in alloc_xstate_buffer()? I think that should probably kill the
> task with something like force_sig() - but as far as I can tell, at
> the moment, it will instead end up at die(), which should only be used
> for kernel bugs.

This question was raised on v1 before [1].

In the end, people suggested to handle the failure, e.g., with tracepoints or
stats. So, proposed this on the allocation site:

+       state_ptr = vmalloc(newsz);
+       if (!state_ptr) {
+               trace_x86_fpu_xstate_alloc_failed(fpu);
+               return -ENOMEM;
+       }

Also, I tried to justify this to Boris [2]:

  >> Maybe it is possible to backtrack this allocation failure out of #NM
  >> handling. But the tracepoint can provide a clear context, although limited
  >> to those using it.

  > Yes, add it when it is really needed. Not slapping it proactively and
  > hoping for any potential usage.

Let me know if you have a better way.

Thanks,
Chang

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c4669d5f-11b8-3879-562c-78a791b86...@intel.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210204131002.ga17...@zn.tnic/