It is unclear from the changelog if this new patch was split from an existing
patch or new content.
the file ops seem to come from mgmnt/main.c, which call what could be file ops
here. why is this complicated redirection needed ?
On 3/23/21 10:29 PM, Lizhi Hou wrote:
> Helper functions for char device node creation / removal for platform
> drivers. This is part of platform driver infrastructure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sonal Santan <sonal.san...@xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Max Zhen <max.z...@xilinx.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi....@xilinx.com>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/xrt/lib/cdev.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 232 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/xrt/lib/cdev.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xrt/lib/cdev.c b/drivers/fpga/xrt/lib/cdev.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..38efd24b6e10
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/xrt/lib/cdev.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Xilinx Alveo FPGA device node helper functions.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2020-2021 Xilinx, Inc.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Cheng Zhen <m...@xilinx.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include "xleaf.h"
> +
> +extern struct class *xrt_class;
> +
> +#define XRT_CDEV_DIR "xfpga"
maybe "xrt_fpga" or just "xrt"
> +#define INODE2PDATA(inode) \
> + container_of((inode)->i_cdev, struct xrt_subdev_platdata, xsp_cdev)
> +#define INODE2PDEV(inode) \
> + to_platform_device(kobj_to_dev((inode)->i_cdev->kobj.parent))
> +#define CDEV_NAME(sysdev) (strchr((sysdev)->kobj.name, '!') + 1)
> +
> +/* Allow it to be accessed from cdev. */
> +static void xleaf_devnode_allowed(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct xrt_subdev_platdata *pdata = DEV_PDATA(pdev);
> +
> + /* Allow new opens. */
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> + pdata->xsp_devnode_online = true;
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> +}
> +
> +/* Turn off access from cdev and wait for all existing user to go away. */
> +static int xleaf_devnode_disallowed(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct xrt_subdev_platdata *pdata = DEV_PDATA(pdev);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> +
> + /* Prevent new opens. */
> + pdata->xsp_devnode_online = false;
> + /* Wait for existing user to close. */
> + while (!ret && pdata->xsp_devnode_ref) {
> + int rc;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> + rc = wait_for_completion_killable(&pdata->xsp_devnode_comp);
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> +
> + if (rc == -ERESTARTSYS) {
> + /* Restore online state. */
> + pdata->xsp_devnode_online = true;
> + xrt_err(pdev, "%s is in use, ref=%d",
> + CDEV_NAME(pdata->xsp_sysdev),
> + pdata->xsp_devnode_ref);
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_device *
> +__xleaf_devnode_open(struct inode *inode, bool excl)
> +{
> + struct xrt_subdev_platdata *pdata = INODE2PDATA(inode);
> + struct platform_device *pdev = INODE2PDEV(inode);
> + bool opened = false;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> +
> + if (pdata->xsp_devnode_online) {
> + if (excl && pdata->xsp_devnode_ref) {
> + xrt_err(pdev, "%s has already been opened exclusively",
> + CDEV_NAME(pdata->xsp_sysdev));
> + } else if (!excl && pdata->xsp_devnode_excl) {
> + xrt_err(pdev, "%s has been opened exclusively",
> + CDEV_NAME(pdata->xsp_sysdev));
> + } else {
> + pdata->xsp_devnode_ref++;
> + pdata->xsp_devnode_excl = excl;
> + opened = true;
> + xrt_info(pdev, "opened %s, ref=%d",
> + CDEV_NAME(pdata->xsp_sysdev),
> + pdata->xsp_devnode_ref);
> + }
> + } else {
> + xrt_err(pdev, "%s is offline", CDEV_NAME(pdata->xsp_sysdev));
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> +
> + pdev = opened ? pdev : NULL;
> + return pdev;
> +}
> +
> +struct platform_device *
> +xleaf_devnode_open_excl(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + return __xleaf_devnode_open(inode, true);
> +}
This function is unused, remove.
> +
> +struct platform_device *
> +xleaf_devnode_open(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + return __xleaf_devnode_open(inode, false);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xleaf_devnode_open);
does this really need to be exported ?
> +
> +void xleaf_devnode_close(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + struct xrt_subdev_platdata *pdata = INODE2PDATA(inode);
> + struct platform_device *pdev = INODE2PDEV(inode);
> + bool notify = false;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> +
> + WARN_ON(pdata->xsp_devnode_ref == 0);
> + pdata->xsp_devnode_ref--;
> + if (pdata->xsp_devnode_ref == 0) {
> + pdata->xsp_devnode_excl = false;
> + notify = true;
> + }
> + if (notify) {
> + xrt_info(pdev, "closed %s, ref=%d",
> + CDEV_NAME(pdata->xsp_sysdev), pdata->xsp_devnode_ref);
xsp_devnode_ref will always be 0, so no need to report it.
> + } else {
> + xrt_info(pdev, "closed %s, notifying waiter",
> + CDEV_NAME(pdata->xsp_sysdev));
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> +
> + if (notify)
> + complete(&pdata->xsp_devnode_comp);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xleaf_devnode_close);
> +
> +static inline enum xrt_subdev_file_mode
> +devnode_mode(struct xrt_subdev_drvdata *drvdata)
> +{
> + return drvdata->xsd_file_ops.xsf_mode;
> +}
> +
> +int xleaf_devnode_create(struct platform_device *pdev, const char *file_name,
> + const char *inst_name)
> +{
> + struct xrt_subdev_drvdata *drvdata = DEV_DRVDATA(pdev);
> + struct xrt_subdev_file_ops *fops = &drvdata->xsd_file_ops;
> + struct xrt_subdev_platdata *pdata = DEV_PDATA(pdev);
> + struct cdev *cdevp;
> + struct device *sysdev;
> + int ret = 0;
> + char fname[256];
> +
> + mutex_init(&pdata->xsp_devnode_lock);
> + init_completion(&pdata->xsp_devnode_comp);
> +
> + cdevp = &DEV_PDATA(pdev)->xsp_cdev;
> + cdev_init(cdevp, &fops->xsf_ops);
> + cdevp->owner = fops->xsf_ops.owner;
> + cdevp->dev = MKDEV(MAJOR(fops->xsf_dev_t), pdev->id);
> +
> + /*
> + * Set pdev as parent of cdev so that when pdev (and its platform
> + * data) will not be freed when cdev is not freed.
> + */
> + cdev_set_parent(cdevp, &DEV(pdev)->kobj);
> +
> + ret = cdev_add(cdevp, cdevp->dev, 1);
> + if (ret) {
> + xrt_err(pdev, "failed to add cdev: %d", ret);
> + goto failed;
> + }
> + if (!file_name)
> + file_name = pdev->name;
> + if (!inst_name) {
> + if (devnode_mode(drvdata) == XRT_SUBDEV_FILE_MULTI_INST) {
> + snprintf(fname, sizeof(fname), "%s/%s/%s.%u",
> + XRT_CDEV_DIR, DEV_PDATA(pdev)->xsp_root_name,
> + file_name, pdev->id);
> + } else {
> + snprintf(fname, sizeof(fname), "%s/%s/%s",
> + XRT_CDEV_DIR, DEV_PDATA(pdev)->xsp_root_name,
> + file_name);
> + }
> + } else {
> + snprintf(fname, sizeof(fname), "%s/%s/%s.%s", XRT_CDEV_DIR,
> + DEV_PDATA(pdev)->xsp_root_name, file_name, inst_name);
> + }
> + sysdev = device_create(xrt_class, NULL, cdevp->dev, NULL, "%s", fname);
> + if (IS_ERR(sysdev)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(sysdev);
> + xrt_err(pdev, "failed to create device node: %d", ret);
> + goto failed_cdev_add;
> + }
> + pdata->xsp_sysdev = sysdev;
> +
> + xleaf_devnode_allowed(pdev);
> +
> + xrt_info(pdev, "created (%d, %d): /dev/%s",
> + MAJOR(cdevp->dev), pdev->id, fname);
> + return 0;
> +
> +failed_cdev_add:
> + cdev_del(cdevp);
> +failed:
> + cdevp->owner = NULL;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int xleaf_devnode_destroy(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct xrt_subdev_platdata *pdata = DEV_PDATA(pdev);
> + struct cdev *cdevp = &pdata->xsp_cdev;
> + dev_t dev = cdevp->dev;
> + int rc;
> +
> + rc = xleaf_devnode_disallowed(pdev);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
Failure of one leaf to be destroyed is not handled well.
could a able to destroy check be done over the whole group ?
Tom
> +
> + xrt_info(pdev, "removed (%d, %d): /dev/%s/%s", MAJOR(dev), MINOR(dev),
> + XRT_CDEV_DIR, CDEV_NAME(pdata->xsp_sysdev));
> + device_destroy(xrt_class, cdevp->dev);
> + pdata->xsp_sysdev = NULL;
> + cdev_del(cdevp);
> + return 0;
> +}
