On Tue 2021-03-30 14:53:52, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2021-03-30, Petr Mladek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sun 2021-03-28 10:09:32, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> >> 
> >> s/sempahore/semaphore/
> >> s/exacly/exactly/
> >> s/unregistred/unregistered/
> >> s/interation/iteration/
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]>
> >
> > John,
> >
> > it conflicts with the patchset removing printk safe buffers[1].
> > Would you prefer to queue this into the patchset?
> > Or should I push it into printk/linux.git, printk-rework and you would
> > base v2 on top of it?
> 
> Go ahead and push it to printk-rework. I'll base v2 on top of it.

The patch is committed in printk/linux.git, branch printk-rework.
It is queued for 5.13.

Best Regards,
Petr

Reply via email to