On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 08:53:02AM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote: > > > No, please read the code carefully. > > We can duplicate conditional, but it brings a bit of inconsistency to how > > the counters are printed. > > Thanks for clarification, I am still confused as the original > code print the real mode based on dev->master_cfg, the new > code is printing mode based on frequency. > > My understanding is the original code could fall back to a lower > speed when higher speed modes were not set successfully. For > example, high speed mode falls back to fast mode:
This is a good catch! I should be fixed by a separate patch I assume. > if ((dev->master_cfg & DW_IC_CON_SPEED_MASK) == > DW_IC_CON_SPEED_HIGH) { > if ((comp_param1 & DW_IC_COMP_PARAM_1_SPEED_MODE_MASK) > != DW_IC_COMP_PARAM_1_SPEED_MODE_HIGH) { > dev_err(dev->dev, "High Speed not supported!\n"); > dev->master_cfg &= ~DW_IC_CON_SPEED_MASK; > dev->master_cfg |= DW_IC_CON_SPEED_FAST; Basically we have to adjust timings here to reflect this change. > dev->hs_hcnt = 0; > dev->hs_lcnt = 0; > } -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko