friendly ping.

On 2021/3/25 19:45, lixiaokeng wrote:
> The max_part may overflow. For example,
>
> modprobe brd rd_nr=3 rd_size=102400 max_part=1073741824(2^30)
>
> Expected result
> NAME             MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
> ram0               1:0    0   100M  0 disk
> ram1               1:256  0   100M  0 disk
> ram2               1:512  0   100M  0 disk
>
> Actual result
> NAME             MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
> ram0             259:0    0   100M  0 disk
> ram1             259:1    0   100M  0 disk
> ram2             259:2    0   100M  0 disk
>
> Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lixiaokeng <lixiaok...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqian...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/brd.c | 8 +++-----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/drivers/block/brd.c
> index c43a6ab4b1f3..c91831cd5d2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/brd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/brd.c
> @@ -457,21 +457,19 @@ static void brd_del_one(struct brd_device *brd)
>
>  static inline void brd_check_and_reset_par(void)
>  {
> -     if (unlikely(!max_part))
> +     if (unlikely(max_part <= 0))
>               max_part = 1;
>
>       /*
>        * make sure 'max_part' can be divided exactly by (1U << MINORBITS),
>        * otherwise, it is possiable to get same dev_t when adding partitions.
>        */
> -     if ((1U << MINORBITS) % max_part != 0)
> -             max_part = 1UL << fls(max_part);
> -
>       if (max_part > DISK_MAX_PARTS) {
>               pr_info("brd: max_part can't be larger than %d, reset max_part 
> = %d.\n",
>                       DISK_MAX_PARTS, DISK_MAX_PARTS);
>               max_part = DISK_MAX_PARTS;
> -     }
> +     } else if ((1U << MINORBITS) % max_part != 0)
> +             max_part = 1UL << fls(max_part);
>  }
>
>  static int __init brd_init(void)

Reply via email to