On 04/01, Hillf Danton wrote: > > If I dont misread it, the lockdep chain will likely evolve from > > event_mutex -> uprobe.register_rwsem -> dup_mmap_sem -> mm.mmap_lock -> > event_mutex > to > dup_mmap_sem -> mm.mmap_lock -> dup_mmap_sem > > after this patch as both uprobe_register() and uprobe_unregister() would take > dup_mmap_sem.
Hmm, please correct me, but I don't think so. I think mmap_lock -> dup_mmap_sem is not possible. Oleg.
