On 4/5/21 11:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtyl...@omprussia.ru>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 705e9195187d85249fbb0eaa844b1604a98fbc9a ]
> 
> The 'reason' variable in module_sig_check() points to 3 strings across
> the *switch* statement, all needlessly starting with the same text.
> Let's put the starting text into the pr_notice() call -- it saves 21
> bytes of the object code (x86 gcc 10.2.1).
> 
> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <j...@perches.com>
> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbe...@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtyl...@omprussia.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <j...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/module.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index ab1f97cfe18d..9fe3e9b85348 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -2908,16 +2908,17 @@ static int module_sig_check(struct load_info *info, 
> int flags)
>                * enforcing, certain errors are non-fatal.
>                */
>       case -ENODATA:
> -             reason = "Loading of unsigned module";
> +             reason = "unsigned module";
>               goto decide;
>       case -ENOPKG:
> -             reason = "Loading of module with unsupported crypto";
> +             reason = "module with unsupported crypto";
>               goto decide;
>       case -ENOKEY:
> -             reason = "Loading of module with unavailable key";
> +             reason = "module with unavailable key";
>       decide:
>               if (is_module_sig_enforced()) {
> -                     pr_notice("%s is rejected\n", reason);
> +                     pr_notice("%s: loading of %s is rejected\n",
> +                               info->name, reason);

   Mhm, in 5.4 there was no printing of 'info->name'...

[...]

MBR, Sergey

Reply via email to