On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 13:29 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:20:46 -0800 > Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Introduce printk_address to X86_32 in a simplified form for > > now. Reformat X86_64 printk_address to avoid two declarations. > > > > Change the printk formats on X86_32 and 64 to be similar. > > I'm not entirely convinced on this; I need to look closer but it appears the > 32 bit version > doesn't use the "reliable" argument to print a ? in front of the dubious > backtrace entries; > that would be sort of a step backwards; ( >
Sorry, I should have made it clearer that this was more for discussion of the actual formatting. printk_address needs to be ported to X86_32, the one in this patch is just a placeholder. Looking at the X86_64 version it looks like it can be brought straight across, but I haven't tested that yet. Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
