On 21/04/07 03:01PM, Wen Yang wrote:
> From: Wen Yang <simon...@alibaba-inc.com>
>
> The kworker has occupied 100% of the CPU for several days:
> PID USER  PR  NI VIRT RES SHR S  %CPU  %MEM TIME+  COMMAND
> 68086 root 20 0  0    0   0   R  100.0 0.0  9718:18 kworker/u64:11
>
> And the stack obtained through sysrq is as follows:
> [20613144.850426] task: ffff8800b5e08000 task.stack: ffffc9001342c000
> [20613144.850427] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0240743>] ^Ac
> [<ffffffffa0240743>] ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations+0x1b3/0x480
> [ext4]
> [20613144.850428] RSP: 0018:ffffc9001342f740  EFLAGS: 00000246
> [20613144.850428] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8813bb5f72f0 RCX:
> 0000000000000000
> [20613144.850429] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff880268291d78 RDI:
> ffff880268291d98
> [20613144.850430] RBP: ffffc9001342f7e8 R08: 00493b8bc070da84 R09:
> 0000000000000000
> [20613144.850430] R10: 0000000000001800 R11: ffff880155e7c380 R12:
> ffff880268291d98
> [20613144.850431] R13: ffff8813bb5f72e0 R14: ffff880268291d78 R15:
> ffff880268291d68
> [20613144.850432] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff881fbf080000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [20613144.850432] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [20613144.850433] CR2: 000000c000823010 CR3: 0000000001c08000 CR4:
> 00000000003606f0
> [20613144.850434] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
> 0000000000000000
> [20613144.850434] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:
> 0000000000000400
> [20613144.850435] Stack:
> [20613144.850435]  ffff881942d6a6e8^Ac ffff8813bb5f72d0^Ac 
> 00000001a02427cf^Ac 0000000000000140^Ac
> [20613144.850436]  ffff880f80618000^Ac 0000000000000000^Ac 
> ffffc9001342f770^Ac ffffc9001342f770^Ac
> [20613144.850437]  ffffea0056360dc0^Ac ffff88158d837000^Ac 
> ffffea0045155f80^Ac ffff88114557e000^Ac
> [20613144.850438] Call Trace:
> [20613144.850439]  [<ffffffffa0244209>] ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x429/0x550 [ext4]
> [20613144.850439]  [<ffffffffa02389ae>] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0xb5e/0xf30 [ext4]
> [20613144.850440]  [<ffffffff811c0001>] ? 
> numa_zonelist_order_handler+0xa1/0x1c0
> [20613144.850441]  [<ffffffffa0204b52>] ext4_map_blocks+0x172/0x620 [ext4]
> [20613144.850441]  [<ffffffffa020835d>] ? ext4_writepages+0x4cd/0xf00 [ext4]
> [20613144.850442]  [<ffffffffa0208675>] ext4_writepages+0x7e5/0xf00 [ext4]
> [20613144.850442]  [<ffffffff811c1410>] ? wb_position_ratio+0x1f0/0x1f0
> [20613144.850443]  [<ffffffff811c487e>] do_writepages+0x1e/0x30
> [20613144.850444]  [<ffffffff81280265>] __writeback_single_inode+0x45/0x320
> [20613144.850444]  [<ffffffff81280ab2>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x272/0x600
> [20613144.850445]  [<ffffffff81280ed2>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x92/0xc0
> [20613144.850445]  [<ffffffff81281238>] wb_writeback+0x268/0x300
> [20613144.850446]  [<ffffffff812819f4>] wb_workfn+0xb4/0x380
> [20613144.850447]  [<ffffffff810a5dc9>] process_one_work+0x189/0x420
> [20613144.850447]  [<ffffffff810a60ae>] worker_thread+0x4e/0x4b0
> [20613144.850448]  [<ffffffff810a6060>] ? process_one_work+0x420/0x420
> [20613144.850448]  [<ffffffff810ac696>] kthread+0xe6/0x100
> [20613144.850449]  [<ffffffff810ac5b0>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
> [20613144.850450]  [<ffffffff81741dd9>] ret_from_fork+0x39/0x50
>
> The cpu resources of the cloud server are precious, and the server
> cannot be restarted after running for a long time, so a configuration
> parameter is added to prevent this endless loop.

Strange, if there is a endless loop here. Then I would definitely see
if there is any accounting problem in pa->pa_count. Otherwise busy=1
should not be set everytime. ext4_mb_show_pa() function may help debug this.

If yes, then that means there always exists either a file preallocation
or a group preallocation. Maybe it is possible, in some use case.
Others may know of such use case, if any.

>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <weny...@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <ty...@mit.edu>
> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.ker...@dilger.ca>
> Cc: Baoyou Xie <baoyou....@alibaba-inc.com>
> Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  fs/ext4/ext4.h    |  1 +
>  fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>  fs/ext4/mballoc.h |  2 ++
>  fs/ext4/sysfs.c   |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 2866d24..c238fec 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1543,6 +1543,7 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
>       unsigned long s_mb_last_start;
>       unsigned int s_mb_prefetch;
>       unsigned int s_mb_prefetch_limit;
> +     unsigned long s_mb_max_retries_per_group;

unsigned int should be enuf no?
>
>       /* stats for buddy allocator */
>       atomic_t s_bal_reqs;    /* number of reqs with len > 1 */
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 99bf091..c126b15 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -2853,6 +2853,8 @@ int ext4_mb_init(struct super_block *sb)
>       sbi->s_mb_stream_request = MB_DEFAULT_STREAM_THRESHOLD;
>       sbi->s_mb_order2_reqs = MB_DEFAULT_ORDER2_REQS;
>       sbi->s_mb_max_inode_prealloc = MB_DEFAULT_MAX_INODE_PREALLOC;
> +     sbi->s_mb_max_retries_per_group = MB_DISCARD_RETRIES_FOREVER;
> +
>       /*
>        * The default group preallocation is 512, which for 4k block
>        * sizes translates to 2 megabytes.  However for bigalloc file
> @@ -4206,6 +4208,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_new_preallocation(struct 
> ext4_allocation_context *ac)
>                                       ext4_group_t group, int needed)
>  {
>       struct ext4_group_info *grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, group);
> +     struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
>       struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = NULL;
>       struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa, *tmp;
>       struct list_head list;
> @@ -4213,6 +4216,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_new_preallocation(struct 
> ext4_allocation_context *ac)
>       int err;
>       int busy = 0;
>       int free, free_total = 0;
> +     int discard_retries = 0;
unsigned int would be better for comparison too.

>
>       mb_debug(sb, "discard preallocation for group %u\n", group);
>       if (list_empty(&grp->bb_prealloc_list))
> @@ -4291,11 +4295,18 @@ static void ext4_mb_new_preallocation(struct 
> ext4_allocation_context *ac)
>
>       /* if we still need more blocks and some PAs were used, try again */
>       if (free_total < needed && busy) {
> -             ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);
> -             cond_resched();
> -             busy = 0;
> -             goto repeat;
> +             ++discard_retries;
> +             if (sbi && sbi->s_mb_max_retries_per_group < discard_retries) {
> +                     ext4_warning(sb, "The retry count has exceeded the 
> limit: %lu",
> +                                     sbi->s_mb_max_retries_per_group);

I guess it won't hurt if we do add ext4_mb_show_pa() too.
It is anyways enabled only if CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG is set.

> +             } else  {
> +                     ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);
> +                     cond_resched();
> +                     busy = 0;
> +                     goto repeat;
> +             }
>       }
> +
>       ext4_unlock_group(sb, group);
>       ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b);
>       put_bh(bitmap_bh);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
> index e75b474..fa5b5a3 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@
>   */
>  #define MB_DEFAULT_MAX_INODE_PREALLOC        512
>
> +#define MB_DISCARD_RETRIES_FOREVER   (-1UL)

Depending upon if this issue can actually happen normally too, then maybe
we need a this value to be pre-configured.
Again others may have a better suggestion here.

> +
>  struct ext4_free_data {
>       /* this links the free block information from sb_info */
>       struct list_head                efd_list;
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
> index 075aa3a..3549520 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/sysfs.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ static ssize_t journal_task_show(struct ext4_sb_info 
> *sbi, char *buf)
>  EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_stream_req, s_mb_stream_request);
>  EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_group_prealloc, s_mb_group_prealloc);
>  EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(mb_max_inode_prealloc, s_mb_max_inode_prealloc);
> +EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UL(mb_max_retries_per_group, s_mb_max_retries_per_group);
>  EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(extent_max_zeroout_kb, s_extent_max_zeroout_kb);
>  EXT4_ATTR(trigger_fs_error, 0200, trigger_test_error);
>  EXT4_RW_ATTR_SBI_UI(err_ratelimit_interval_ms, 
> s_err_ratelimit_state.interval);
> @@ -260,6 +261,7 @@ static ssize_t journal_task_show(struct ext4_sb_info 
> *sbi, char *buf)
>       ATTR_LIST(mb_stream_req),
>       ATTR_LIST(mb_group_prealloc),
>       ATTR_LIST(mb_max_inode_prealloc),
> +     ATTR_LIST(mb_max_retries_per_group),
>       ATTR_LIST(max_writeback_mb_bump),
>       ATTR_LIST(extent_max_zeroout_kb),
>       ATTR_LIST(trigger_fs_error),
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

Reply via email to