On Tue 06-04-21 22:49:26, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
> 
> Opportunity for min().
> 
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/minmax.cocci
> 
> Fixes: 8636e3295ce3 ("coccinelle: misc: add minmax script")
> CC: Denis Efremov <efre...@linux.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@inria.fr>
...
> --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int inotify_add_to_idr(struct idr
> 
>       spin_unlock(idr_lock);
>       idr_preload_end();
> -     return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> +     return min(ret, 0);
>  }

Honestly, while previous expression is a standard idiom for "if 'ret' holds
an error, return it", the new expression is harder to understand for me. So
I prefer to keep things as they are in this particular case...

                                                                Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Reply via email to