On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 10:23 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Anyhow, I don't feel all that strongly about it so if the opinion of the
> > early start of day maintainer(s) is strongly in favour of ASM I'll defer
> > to that.
> >
>
> My opinion is that I want it done properly (PIC and all that jazz) or
> not at all, and certainly would not want to mix linear and
> paging-enabled code in the same file. When it comes to assembly code,
> at least people can *see* that there there be dragons.
>
> The plus *and* minus of a C version is that it's easier for people to
> modify. The plus side of that is that if we really need it, it's a lot
> cleaner; the minus side is that it may encourage more code to creep into
> the pre-paging code, which would not be a good thing IMO.
Seems reasonable to me. I'll integrate your asm diff with the other
changes and give it a whirl.
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
Never go to bed mad. Stay up and fight.
-- Phyllis Diller, "Phyllis Diller's Housekeeping Hints"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
