On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 03:13:09PM +0530, Rijo Thomas wrote:
> @@ -340,7 +398,8 @@ int handle_open_session(struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg
> *arg, u32 *info,
>
> int handle_load_ta(void *data, u32 size, struct tee_ioctl_open_session_arg
> *arg)
> {
> - struct tee_cmd_load_ta cmd = {0};
> + struct tee_cmd_unload_ta unload_cmd = {0};
> + struct tee_cmd_load_ta load_cmd = {0};
It's better style to write:
struct tee_cmd_unload_ta unload_cmd = {};
It doesn't make a difference in this case, but if the first struct
member is a pointer then {0} can generate a Sparse warning. Or
depending on which bugs your version of GCC has it can affect whether
struct holes are initialized. But mostly it's just the prefered style.
regards,
dan carpenter
