From: Saravana Kannan <sarava...@google.com>
commit eed6e41813deb9ee622cd9242341f21430d7789f upstream.
list_for_each_entry_safe() is only useful if we are deleting nodes in a
linked list within the loop. It doesn't protect against other threads
adding/deleting nodes to the list in parallel. We need to grab
deferred_probe_mutex when traversing the deferred_probe_pending_list.
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 25b4e70dcce9 ("driver core: allow stopping deferred probe after init")
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <sarava...@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210402040342.2944858-2-sarava...@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/base/dd.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -292,14 +292,16 @@ int driver_deferred_probe_check_state(st
static void deferred_probe_timeout_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
{
- struct device_private *private, *p;
+ struct device_private *p;
driver_deferred_probe_timeout = 0;
driver_deferred_probe_trigger();
flush_work(&deferred_probe_work);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(private, p, &deferred_probe_pending_list,
deferred_probe)
- dev_info(private->device, "deferred probe pending\n");
+ mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry(p, &deferred_probe_pending_list, deferred_probe)
+ dev_info(p->device, "deferred probe pending\n");
+ mutex_unlock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
wake_up_all(&probe_timeout_waitqueue);
}
static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(deferred_probe_timeout_work,
deferred_probe_timeout_work_func);
