From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.w...@nxp.com>

[ Upstream commit 16b82e75c15a7dbd564ea3654f3feb61df9e1e6f ]

The input MCLK is 12.288MHz, the desired output sysclk is 11.2896MHz
and sample rate is 44100Hz, with the configuration pllprescale=2,
postscale=sysclkdiv=1, some chip may have wrong bclk
and lrclk output with pll enabled in master mode, but with the
configuration pllprescale=1, postscale=2, the output clock is correct.

>From Datasheet, the PLL performs best when f2 is between
90MHz and 100MHz when the desired sysclk output is 11.2896MHz
or 12.288MHz, so sysclkdiv = 2 (f2/8) is the best choice.

So search available sysclk_divs from 2 to 1 other than from 1 to 2.

Fixes: 84fdc00d519f ("ASoC: codec: wm9860: Refactor PLL out freq search")
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.w...@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckee...@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/1616150926-22892-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.w...@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
index 660ec46eecf2..ceaf3bbb18e6 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
@@ -707,7 +707,13 @@ int wm8960_configure_pll(struct snd_soc_component 
*component, int freq_in,
        best_freq_out = -EINVAL;
        *sysclk_idx = *dac_idx = *bclk_idx = -1;
 
-       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sysclk_divs); ++i) {
+       /*
+        * From Datasheet, the PLL performs best when f2 is between
+        * 90MHz and 100MHz, the desired sysclk output is 11.2896MHz
+        * or 12.288MHz, then sysclkdiv = 2 is the best choice.
+        * So search sysclk_divs from 2 to 1 other than from 1 to 2.
+        */
+       for (i = ARRAY_SIZE(sysclk_divs) - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
                if (sysclk_divs[i] == -1)
                        continue;
                for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(dac_divs); ++j) {
-- 
2.30.2



Reply via email to