Cédric,

On Mon, Apr 12 2021 at 11:06, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 4/10/21 1:58 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> --- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
>> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *des
>>      unsigned int irq;
>>  
>>      if (desc->istate & IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS ||
>> -        irq_settings_is_polled(desc))
>> +        irq_settings_is_polled(desc) | irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
>
> Shouldn't it be '||' instead  ?

It could. But that's intentionally '|'. Why?

Because that lets the compiler merge the bit checks into one and
therefore spares one conditional branch.

>>              return;
>>  
>>      if (bad_action_ret(action_ret)) {
>> 
>
> We could test irq_settings_no_debug() directly under handle_nested_irq() 
> and handle_irq_event_percpu() to avoid calling note_interrupt(), just 
> like we do for noirqdebug.

We can do that, but then we should not just make it:

   if (!irqnodebug && !irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
        note_interrupt(...);

Instead have only one condition:

   if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
        note_interrupt(...);

See the uncompiled delta patch below.

Thanks,

        tglx
---
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1690,6 +1690,9 @@ static int
                                irq_settings_set_no_debug(desc);
                }
 
+               if (noirqdebug)
+                       irq_settings_set_no_debug(desc);
+
                if (new->flags & IRQF_ONESHOT)
                        desc->istate |= IRQS_ONESHOT;
 
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void note_interrupt(struct irq_desc *des
        unsigned int irq;
 
        if (desc->istate & IRQS_POLL_INPROGRESS ||
-           irq_settings_is_polled(desc) | irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
+           irq_settings_is_polled(desc))
                return;
 
        if (bad_action_ret(action_ret)) {
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ void handle_nested_irq(unsigned int irq)
        for_each_action_of_desc(desc, action)
                action_ret |= action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);
 
-       if (!noirqdebug)
+       if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
                note_interrupt(desc, action_ret);
 
        raw_spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ irqreturn_t handle_irq_event_percpu(stru
 
        add_interrupt_randomness(desc->irq_data.irq, flags);
 
-       if (!noirqdebug)
+       if (!irq_settings_no_debug(desc))
                note_interrupt(desc, retval);
        return retval;
 }

Reply via email to