On 14/04/21 13:21, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -13.8% regression of stress-ng.vm-segv.ops_per_sec due to
> commit:
>
>
> commit: 38ac256d1c3e6b5155071ed7ba87db50a40a4b58 ("[PATCH v5 1/3] sched/fair:
> Ignore percpu threads for imbalance pulls")
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Valentin-Schneider/sched-fair-load-balance-vs-capacity-margins/20210408-060830
> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
> 0a2b65c03e9b47493e1442bf9c84badc60d9bffb
>
> in testcase: stress-ng
> on test machine: 96 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with
> 192G memory
> with following parameters:
>
> nr_threads: 10%
> disk: 1HDD
> testtime: 60s
> fs: ext4
> class: os
> test: vm-segv
> cpufreq_governor: performance
> ucode: 0x5003006
>
>
That's almost exactly the same result as [1], which is somewhat annoying
for me because I wasn't able to reproduce those results back then. Save
from scrounging the exact same machine to try this out, I'm not sure what's
the best way forward. I guess I can re-run the workload on whatever
machines I have and try to spot any potentially problematic pattern in the
trace...
[1]: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20210223023004.GB25487@xsang-OptiPlex-9020
