On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 07:56:05AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > binfmt_flat tends to go through Greg's uclinux tree, adding him and > the list.
FWIW, my involvement with binfmt_flat had been pretty much nil - the least trivial had been "binfmt_flat: flat_{get,put}_addr_from_rp() should be able to fail" about 4 years ago and that fell out of hunting for places where __get_user() had been used without checking error values. It's in fs/*, but I've no way to test it and I have pretty much zero familiarity with the guts of that one, so I can't give any useful feedback on that series. So consider the Christoph's comment seconded - you want it reviewed by gerg et.al., and it probably ought to go via gerg/uclinux.git tree. I'm reasonably familiar with binfmt_{elf,misc,script}; anything else gets touched as part of larger series and only with sanity checks from other folks, if the changes are not entirely trivial.