Le 16/04/2021 à 00:43, Daniel Axtens a écrit :
Hi Christophe,
Pagewalk ignores hugepd entries and walk down the tables
as if it was traditionnal entries, leading to crazy result.
Add walk_hugepd_range() and use it to walk hugepage tables.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu>
---
mm/pagewalk.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/pagewalk.c b/mm/pagewalk.c
index e81640d9f177..410a9d8f7572 100644
--- a/mm/pagewalk.c
+++ b/mm/pagewalk.c
@@ -58,6 +58,32 @@ static int walk_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end,
return err;
}
+static int walk_hugepd_range(hugepd_t *phpd, unsigned long addr,
+ unsigned long end, struct mm_walk *walk, int
pdshift)
+{
+ int err = 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD
+ const struct mm_walk_ops *ops = walk->ops;
+ int shift = hugepd_shift(*phpd);
+ int page_size = 1 << shift;
+
+ if (addr & (page_size - 1))
+ return 0;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ pte_t *pte = hugepte_offset(*phpd, addr, pdshift);
+
+ err = ops->pte_entry(pte, addr, addr + page_size, walk);
+ if (err)
+ break;
+ if (addr >= end - page_size)
+ break;
+ addr += page_size;
+ }
Initially I thought this was a somewhat unintuitive way to structure
this loop, but I see it parallels the structure of walk_pte_range_inner,
so I think the consistency is worth it.
I notice the pte walking code potentially takes some locks: does this
code need to do that?
arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c says that hugepds are protected by the
mm->page_table_lock, but I don't think we're taking it in this code.
I'll add it, thanks.
+#endif
+ return err;
+}
+
static int walk_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
struct mm_walk *walk)
{
@@ -108,7 +134,10 @@ static int walk_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end,
goto again;
}
- err = walk_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, walk);
+ if (is_hugepd(__hugepd(pmd_val(*pmd))))
+ err = walk_hugepd_range((hugepd_t *)pmd, addr, next,
walk, PMD_SHIFT);
+ else
+ err = walk_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, walk);
if (err)
break;
} while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);
@@ -157,7 +186,10 @@ static int walk_pud_range(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end,
if (pud_none(*pud))
goto again;
- err = walk_pmd_range(pud, addr, next, walk);
+ if (is_hugepd(__hugepd(pud_val(*pud))))
+ err = walk_hugepd_range((hugepd_t *)pud, addr, next,
walk, PUD_SHIFT);
+ else
+ err = walk_pmd_range(pud, addr, next, walk);
I'm a bit worried you might end up calling into walk_hugepd_range with
ops->pte_entry == NULL, and then jumping to 0.
You are right, I missed it.
I'll bail out of walk_hugepd_range() when ops->pte_entry is NULL.
static int walk_pud_range(p4d_t *p4d, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
struct mm_walk *walk)
{
...
pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
do {
...
if ((!walk->vma && (pud_leaf(*pud) || !pud_present(*pud))) ||
walk->action == ACTION_CONTINUE ||
!(ops->pmd_entry || ops->pte_entry)) <<< THIS CHECK
continue;
...
if (is_hugepd(__hugepd(pud_val(*pud))))
err = walk_hugepd_range((hugepd_t *)pud, addr, next,
walk, PUD_SHIFT);
else
err = walk_pmd_range(pud, addr, next, walk);
if (err)
break;
} while (pud++, addr = next, addr != end);
walk_pud_range will proceed if there is _either_ an ops->pmd_entry _or_
an ops->pte_entry, but walk_hugepd_range will call ops->pte_entry
unconditionally.
The same issue applies to walk_{p4d,pgd}_range...
Kind regards,
Daniel
Thanks
Christophe
