Hi,

On 19.04.21 08:02, Sebastian Fricke wrote:
s/when the camera active/when the camera is active/
s/thus not isr protection/thus no ISR protection/

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fri...@posteo.net>
---
  drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-params.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-params.c 
b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-params.c
index b6beddd988d0..ead948a2d01e 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-params.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/rockchip/rkisp1/rkisp1-params.c
@@ -1258,7 +1258,7 @@ void rkisp1_params_configure(struct rkisp1_params *params,
        rkisp1_params_config_parameter(params);
  }
-/* Not called when the camera active, thus not isr protection. */
+/* Not called when the camera is active, thus no ISR protection. */

I think it would better to write

/* Not called when the camera is active, therefore there is no need to acquire 
a lock */

Thanks,
Dafna

  void rkisp1_params_disable(struct rkisp1_params *params)
  {
        rkisp1_param_clear_bits(params, RKISP1_CIF_ISP_DPCC_MODE,

Reply via email to