Hello!
On Tuesday 20 April 2021 14:17:21 Jianjun Wang wrote:
> +static void mtk_pcie_enable_msi(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> +{
> + int i;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < PCIE_MSI_SET_NUM; i++) {
> + struct mtk_msi_set *msi_set = &port->msi_sets[i];
> +
> + msi_set->base = port->base + PCIE_MSI_SET_BASE_REG +
> + i * PCIE_MSI_SET_OFFSET;
> + msi_set->msg_addr = port->reg_base + PCIE_MSI_SET_BASE_REG +
> + i * PCIE_MSI_SET_OFFSET;
> +
> + /* Configure the MSI capture address */
> + writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr), msi_set->base);
> + writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr),
> + port->base + PCIE_MSI_SET_ADDR_HI_BASE +
> + i * PCIE_MSI_SET_ADDR_HI_OFFSET);
This looks like as setting MSI doorbell address to MSI doorbell address.
> +static void mtk_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct mtk_msi_set *msi_set = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> + struct mtk_pcie_port *port = data->domain->host_data;
> + unsigned long hwirq;
> +
> + hwirq = data->hwirq % PCIE_MSI_IRQS_PER_SET;
> +
> + msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr);
> + msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(msi_set->msg_addr);
> + msg->data = hwirq;
> + dev_dbg(port->dev, "msi#%#lx address_hi %#x address_lo %#x data %d\n",
> + hwirq, msg->address_hi, msg->address_lo, msg->data);
... which is later used in compose_msi_msg().
Marc in some other patches for other pci controller drivers changed this
address to just main "port" structure. It simplified implementations and
also avoided need to declare additional member "msg_addr".
Marc, would it be possible to simplify it also for this driver and just
set msg_addr to virt_to_phys(port)?
