On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 05:53:40PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote: > All good with that snippet on my end. > > I wonder if balance_push() shouldn't use the cpu_of() accessor > instead of rq->cpu.
That might be a personal quirk of mine, but for code that is under CONFIG_SMP (as all balancing code must be) I tend to prefer the more explicit rq->cpu usage. cpu_of() obviously also works. > Otherwise, > > + Reviewed-by: Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]> Thanks!, now I get to write a Changelog :-)
