Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks -- Gustavo On 3/5/21 03:19, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall > through to the next case. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org> > --- > net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c > index 41671af6b33f..2b5f89713e36 100644 > --- a/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c > +++ b/net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c > @@ -471,6 +471,7 @@ static int rxrpc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct > sockaddr *addr, > switch (rx->sk.sk_state) { > case RXRPC_UNBOUND: > rx->sk.sk_state = RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND; > + break; > case RXRPC_CLIENT_UNBOUND: > case RXRPC_CLIENT_BOUND: > break; >
