Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks -- Gustavo On 3/5/21 03:50, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of just letting the code > fall through to the next case. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c > index b53a0d87371a..a34810750058 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c > @@ -2158,6 +2158,7 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_handler(struct bnxt *bp, struct > tx_cmp *txcmp) > case CMPL_BASE_TYPE_HWRM_ASYNC_EVENT: > bnxt_async_event_process(bp, > (struct hwrm_async_event_cmpl *)txcmp); > + break; > > default: > break; >
