Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/20/20 12:25, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple > warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of just > letting the code fall through to the next case. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org> > --- > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 1 + > security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > index 2d1af8899cab..600b97677085 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c > @@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ int ima_load_data(enum kernel_load_data_id id, bool > contents) > pr_err("impossible to appraise a module without a file > descriptor. sig_enforce kernel parameter might help\n"); > return -EACCES; /* INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN */ > } > + break; > default: > break; > } > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > index 9b5adeaa47fc..ea634fc3b82f 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c > @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, > struct inode *inode, > rc = ima_filter_rule_match(secid, rule->lsm[i].type, > Audit_equal, > rule->lsm[i].rule); > + break; > default: > break; > } > @@ -802,6 +803,7 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void) > add_rules(default_measurement_rules, > ARRAY_SIZE(default_measurement_rules), > IMA_DEFAULT_POLICY); > + break; > default: > break; > } >
