On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 12:17, Verma, Vishal L <vishal.l.ve...@intel.com> wrote: > > On an operational note, as Dan handed off the branch to me for this cycle, we > missed that the original few commits were inadvertently made on top of a few > CXL commits that went in in the 6.4-rc cycle via the CXL tree. > > git-request-pull included these, and hence they appear in the shortlog and > diffstat below, but the actual merge correctly identifies and skips over them. > I kept it as it is to preserve the linux-next soak time, but if I should have > done it differently, please let me know.
No, this was the right thing to do. Apart from a slightly odd choice of base for this all, the pull looks perfectly normal. Thanks, Linus