On 26.09.2023 18:51, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> From: "Lin, Meng-Bo" <[email protected]>
> 
> Enable sound and modem for the Samsung J5 smartphones. The setup is
> similar to most MSM8916 devices, i.e.:
> 
>  - QDSP6 audio
>  - Speaker/earpiece/headphones/microphones via digital/analog codec
>    in MSM8916/PM8916
>  - WWAN Internet via BAM-DMUX
> 
> except:
> 
>  - There is no secondary microphone, so a different "model" is used to
>    differentiate that in the UCM configuration.
>  - Samsung-specific audio jack detection (not supported yet)
> 
> Co-developed-by: Markuss Broks <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Markuss Broks <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: "Lin, Meng-Bo" <[email protected]>
> [Stephan: Add consistent commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5.dts         |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi
> index fe59be3505fe..2caa820b0c26 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  
>  #include "msm8916-pm8916.dtsi"
> +#include "msm8916-modem-qdsp6.dtsi"
> +
>  #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> @@ -135,6 +137,10 @@ &blsp_uart2 {
>       status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> +&mpss_mem {
> +     reg = <0x0 0x86800000 0x0 0x5800000>;
> +};
> +
>  &pm8916_resin {
>       status = "okay";
>       linux,code = <KEY_VOLUMEDOWN>;
> @@ -154,6 +160,15 @@ &sdhc_2 {
>       cd-gpios = <&tlmm 38 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>  };
>  
> +&sound {
> +     model = "msm8916-1mic";
That's.. vague.. Is that intended?

I also noticed only now that random patches have status
at random places in the property tree.. Removing the disablement
would aid that as well (wink wink)!

Konrad

Reply via email to