Le 01/10/2023 à 15:52, André Apitzsch a écrit :
This commit adds support for Kinetic KTD2026/7 RGB/White LED driver.

Signed-off-by: André Apitzsch <git-atrkszj1ogpsq35pwsn...@public.gmane.org>

...

+static int ktd202x_setup_led_rgb(struct ktd202x *chip, struct device_node *np,
+                                struct ktd202x_led *led, struct led_init_data 
*init_data)
+{
+       struct led_classdev *cdev;
+       struct device_node *child;
+       struct mc_subled *info;
+       int num_channels;
+       int i = 0;
+       u32 reg;
+       int ret;
+
+       num_channels = of_get_available_child_count(np);
+       if (!num_channels || num_channels > chip->num_leds)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       info = devm_kcalloc(chip->dev, num_channels, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!info)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
+               u32 mono_color = 0;

Un-needed init.
And, why is it defined here, while reg is defined out-side the loop?

+
+               ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &reg);
+               if (ret != 0 || reg >= chip->num_leds) {
+                       dev_err(chip->dev, "invalid 'reg' of %pOFn\n", np);

Mossing of_node_put(np);?

+                       return -EINVAL;
+               }
+
+               ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "color", &mono_color);
+               if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) {
+                       dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to parse 'color' of %pOF\n", 
np);

Mossing of_node_put(np);?

+                       return ret;
+               }
+
+               info[i].color_index = mono_color;
+               info[i].channel = reg;
+               info[i].intensity = KTD202X_MAX_BRIGHTNESS;
+               i++;
+       }
+
+       led->mcdev.subled_info = info;
+       led->mcdev.num_colors = num_channels;
+
+       cdev = &led->mcdev.led_cdev;
+       cdev->brightness_set_blocking = ktd202x_brightness_mc_set;
+       cdev->blink_set = ktd202x_blink_mc_set;
+
+       return devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext(chip->dev, 
&led->mcdev, init_data);
+}
+
+static int ktd202x_setup_led_single(struct ktd202x *chip, struct device_node 
*np,
+                                   struct ktd202x_led *led, struct 
led_init_data *init_data)
+{
+       struct led_classdev *cdev;
+       u32 reg;
+       int ret;
+
+       ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &reg);
+       if (ret != 0 || reg >= chip->num_leds) {
+               dev_err(chip->dev, "invalid 'reg' of %pOFn\n", np);
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+       led->index = reg;
+
+       cdev = &led->cdev;
+       cdev->brightness_set_blocking = ktd202x_brightness_single_set;
+       cdev->blink_set = ktd202x_blink_single_set;
+
+       return devm_led_classdev_register_ext(chip->dev, &led->cdev, init_data);
+}
+
+static int ktd202x_add_led(struct ktd202x *chip, struct device_node *np, 
unsigned int index)
+{
+       struct ktd202x_led *led = &chip->leds[index];
+       struct led_init_data init_data = {};
+       struct led_classdev *cdev;
+       u32 color = 0;
Un-needed init.

+       int ret;
+
+       /* Color property is optional in single color case */
+       ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "color", &color);
+       if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) {
+               dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to parse 'color' of %pOF\n", np);
+               return ret;
+       }
+
+       led->chip = chip;
+       init_data.fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(np);
+
+       if (color == LED_COLOR_ID_RGB) {
+               cdev = &led->mcdev.led_cdev;
+               ret = ktd202x_setup_led_rgb(chip, np, led, &init_data);
+       } else {
+               cdev = &led->cdev;
+               ret = ktd202x_setup_led_single(chip, np, led, &init_data);
+       }
+
+       if (ret) {
+               dev_err(chip->dev, "unable to register %s\n", cdev->name);
+               of_node_put(np);

This is strange to have it here.
Why not above after "if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL) {"?

It would look much more natural to have it a few lines below, ... [1]

+               return ret;
+       }
+
+       cdev->max_brightness = KTD202X_MAX_BRIGHTNESS;
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int ktd202x_probe_dt(struct ktd202x *chip)
+{
+       struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(chip->dev), *child;
+       unsigned int i;
+       int count, ret;
+
+       chip->num_leds = (int)(unsigned 
long)of_device_get_match_data(chip->dev);
+
+       count = of_get_available_child_count(np);
+       if (!count || count > chip->num_leds)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       regmap_write(chip->regmap, KTD202X_REG_RESET_CONTROL, 
KTD202X_RSTR_RESET);
+
+       /* Allow the device to execute the complete reset */
+       usleep_range(200, 300);
+
+       i = 0;
+       for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
+               ret = ktd202x_add_led(chip, child, i);
+               if (ret)

[1] ... here.

Otherwise, it is likely that, thanks to a static checker, an additionnal of_node_put() will be added on early exit of the loop.

CJ

+                       return ret;
+               i++;
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}

...

Reply via email to