On 10/2/2023 3:54 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() provides a way to check the type of the
> object evaluated by _DSM call. Use it instead of open coded variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> index f96bf32cd368..280da408c02c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
> @@ -1737,9 +1737,8 @@ __weak void nfit_intel_shutdown_status(struct nfit_mem
> *nfit_mem)
> if ((nfit_mem->dsm_mask & (1 << func)) == 0)
> return;
>
> - out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(handle, guid, revid, func, &in_obj);
> - if (!out_obj || out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER
> - || out_obj->buffer.length < sizeof(smart)) {
> + out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed(handle, guid, revid, func, &in_obj,
> ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER);
This line is 90 characters long, wouldn't it be better to split it ?
> + if (!out_obj || out_obj->buffer.length < sizeof(smart)) {
> dev_dbg(dev->parent, "%s: failed to retrieve initial health\n",
> dev_name(dev));
While at it maybe fix alignment ? :-)
> ACPI_FREE(out_obj);
Just nitpicks, functionally code seems correct to me.
Reviewed-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczyn...@intel.com>
