node->prev is only used to update 'prev' in the unlikely case
of concurrent unqueues.
This can be replaced by a check for node->prev_cpu changing
and then calling decode_cpu() to get the changed 'prev' pointer.

node->cpu (or more particularly) prev->cpu is only used for the
osq_wait_next() call in the unqueue path.
Normally this is exactly the value that the initial xchg() read
from lock->tail (used to obtain 'prev'), but can get updated
by concurrent unqueues.

Both the 'prev' and 'cpu' members of optimistic_spin_node are
now unused and can be deleted.

Signed-off-by: David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com>
---
 kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
index eb8a6dfdb79d..27324b509f68 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
@@ -13,9 +13,8 @@
  */
 
 struct optimistic_spin_node {
-       struct optimistic_spin_node *next, *prev;
+       struct optimistic_spin_node *next;
        int locked;    /* 1 if lock acquired */
-       int cpu;       /* encoded CPU # + 1 value */
        int prev_cpu;  /* encoded CPU # + 1 value */
 };
 
@@ -91,10 +90,9 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
        struct optimistic_spin_node *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
        struct optimistic_spin_node *prev, *next;
        int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
-       int old;
+       int prev_cpu;
 
        node->next = NULL;
-       node->cpu = curr;
 
        /*
         * We need both ACQUIRE (pairs with corresponding RELEASE in
@@ -102,13 +100,12 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
         * the node fields we just initialised) semantics when updating
         * the lock tail.
         */
-       old = atomic_xchg(&lock->tail, curr);
-       if (old == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL)
+       prev_cpu = atomic_xchg(&lock->tail, curr);
+       if (prev_cpu == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL)
                return true;
 
-       node->prev_cpu = old;
-       prev = decode_cpu(old);
-       node->prev = prev;
+       node->prev_cpu = prev_cpu;
+       prev = decode_cpu(prev_cpu);
        node->locked = 0;
 
        /*
@@ -174,9 +171,16 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
 
                /*
                 * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which
-                * case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev pointer.
+                * case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev_cpu value.
                 */
-               prev = READ_ONCE(node->prev);
+               {
+                       int new_prev_cpu = READ_ONCE(node->prev_cpu);
+
+                       if (new_prev_cpu == prev_cpu)
+                               continue;
+                       prev_cpu = new_prev_cpu;
+                       prev = decode_cpu(prev_cpu);
+               }
        }
 
        /*
@@ -186,7 +190,7 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
         * back to @prev.
         */
 
-       next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, prev->cpu);
+       next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, prev_cpu);
        if (!next)
                return false;
 
@@ -198,8 +202,7 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
         * it will wait in Step-A.
         */
 
-       WRITE_ONCE(next->prev_cpu, prev->cpu);
-       WRITE_ONCE(next->prev, prev);
+       WRITE_ONCE(next->prev_cpu, prev_cpu);
        WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, next);
 
        return false;
-- 
2.17.1

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, 
UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)


Reply via email to