On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:32:14 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 3:31 AM Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: > > > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rost...@goodmis.org> > > > > The parse_actions() function uses 'len = str_has_prefix()' to test which > > action is in the string being parsed. But then it goes and repeats the > > logic for each different action. This logic can be simplified and > > duplicate code can be removed as 'len' contains the length of the found > > prefix which should be used for all actions. > > > Link: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240107112044.6702c...@gandalf.local.home/ > > > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rost...@goodmis.org> > > If you want Link to be formally a tag, you should drop the following > blank line. The link is for humans not for parsers. > > > > + if ((len = str_has_prefix(str, "onmatch("))) > > + hid = HANDLER_ONMATCH; > > + else if ((len = str_has_prefix(str, "onmax("))) > > + hid = HANDLER_ONMAX; > > + else if ((len = str_has_prefix(str, "onchange("))) > > + hid = HANDLER_ONCHANGE; > > The repeating check for ( might be moved out as well after this like > > if (str[len] != '(') { > // not sure if you need data to be assigned here as well > ret = -EINVAL; > ... > } > Not sure how that makes it any better. It adds more code. I could start with checking the "on" before checking for "match", "max" and "change", but that just makes it more complex. -- Steve
