On Wed, 17 Jan 2024, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Have both __locks_insert_block and the deadlock and conflict checking
> functions take a struct file_lock_core pointer instead of a struct
> file_lock one. Also, change posix_locks_deadlock to return bool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlay...@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/locks.c | 132
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
>
> /* Must be called with the blocked_lock_lock held! */
> -static int posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
> - struct file_lock *block_fl)
> +static bool posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
> + struct file_lock *block_fl)
> {
> + struct file_lock_core *caller = &caller_fl->fl_core;
> + struct file_lock_core *blocker = &block_fl->fl_core;
> int i = 0;
> - struct file_lock_core *flc = &caller_fl->fl_core;
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&blocked_lock_lock);
>
> @@ -1034,16 +1040,16 @@ static int posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock
> *caller_fl,
> * This deadlock detector can't reasonably detect deadlocks with
> * FL_OFDLCK locks, since they aren't owned by a process, per-se.
> */
> - if (IS_OFDLCK(flc))
> + if (IS_OFDLCK(caller))
> return 0;
return false;
Thanks,
NeilBrown
