* Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-27 22:55:43]:

> Balbir Singh writes:
> 
> > Here's a better and more complete fix for the problem. Could you
> > please see if it works for you? I tested it on a real NUMA box and it
> > seemed to work fine there.
> 
> There are a couple of other changes in behaviour that your patch
> introduces, and I'd like to understand them better before taking the
> patch.  First, with your patch we don't set nodes online if they end
> up having no memory in them because of the memory limit, whereas
> previously we did.  Secondly, in the case where we don't have NUMA
> information, we now set node 0 online after adding each LMB, whereas
> previously we only set it online once.
> 
> If in fact these changes are benign, then your patch description
> should mention them and explain why they are benign.
>

Yes, they are. I'll try and justify the changes with a good detailed
changelog. If people prefer it, I can hide fake NUMA nodes under a
config option, so that it does not come enabled by default.

Thanks for keeping me honest.
 
> Paul.
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 

-- 
        Warm Regards,
        Balbir Singh
        Linux Technology Center
        IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to