Andrew Morton wrote:
int __initdata user_defined_memmap = 0;
checkpatch should have told you that this "= 0" shouldn't be there. But it
doesn't.
checkpatch checks for static initializers, not non-static ones.
Should that be changed?
+ for (pos = (u8 *)hdr; pos < (u8 *)hdr + len; pos ++)
checkpatch should have caught the " ++" but didn't. I think it used to.
It seems to be going backwards?
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
