On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:10:55PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > This memory barrier is not needed and not documented so simply remove > it.
This looks like it should be patch 2 in the series, not patch 1, as it
is cleanup rather than a fix that needs backporting.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrea Parri <and...@rivosinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexgh...@rivosinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrea Parri <parri.and...@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> index 37e87fdcf6a0..0b5c16dfe3f4 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
> @@ -239,7 +239,6 @@ static int patch_text_cb(void *data)
> } else {
> while (atomic_read(&patch->cpu_count) <= num_online_cpus())
> cpu_relax();
> - smp_mb();
> }
>
> return ret;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-ri...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
